Two vols. Crn. 8vo. with Portrait, 36s.

THE PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE AND MEMOIRS

OF

DANIEL O'CONNELL, M.P.

By WM. J. FITZPATRICK, F.S.A.

KNT. ST. GREG. GT.

'In these volumes there is nothing tedious, and they are well put together.'—Standard.

'Mr. Fitzpatrick, who has done more than any living writer for Irish biography,has in this, his latest and most important work earned the gratitude of all studentsof Irish politics.'—Daily Telegraph.

'This work stands high above the extravagant and indiscriminating eulogies ofO'Connell, accompanied by ignorant and malignant denunciations of all opposed tohim, hitherto given to the world by patriotic biographers.'—Times.

'Inspired by love and admiration, pursued with laborious and indefatigableindustry, and guided by honesty and good judgment. It gives a higher and, webelieve, a truer view of O'Connell's character than has been given to the worldbefore.'—Vanity Fair.

'Fresh light is thrown upon a most interesting period of Irish history by thispublication, in which Daniel O'Connell reveals his innermost thoughts upon greatpublic questions, as well as on themes of sacred and private import. Courts andCabinets—the intrigues of public men and the subtleties of political organisations—arealike laid open to the public gaze.'—Daily Chronicle.

'To Mr. Fitzpatrick is due the gratitude of all students of history, of truth, andof human character for the patience and pertinacity with which he has collectedthese letters, and the knowledge, discretion, and tact of his arrangement. He haslet O'Connell tell his own story, and the connecting thread is slight and scientific,such as only minute knowledge of his period could make it. The reader is hardlyconscious of its presence, yet it suffices to weld a huge mass of miscellaneous correspondenceinto an authentic biography and lifelike portrait of the man who, of allothers, made the greatest mark on his country and his generation.'—Athenæum.

'Mr. Fitzpatrick, while presenting to us a collection of moderate extent, has notonly woven them into a web of fair average continuity, but has, as a sculptorwould, presented to us his hero "in the round," so that we may consider each of hisqualities in each varied light, and judge of their combination into a whole, whetherit is mean or noble, consistent or inconsistent, natural or forced.... Fewindeed, as I think, of those who give a careful perusal to these pages, will withholdtheir assent from the double assertion that O'Connell was a great man, and that hewas a good man. Upon this issue the volumes now before us will enable us to tryhim: and in trying him to try ourselves. For who can any longer doubt that somedebt is still due to him; that he was, to say the least, both over-censured and undervalued?'—Mr.Gladstone, in The Nineteenth Century.

London: JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.